Under Ohio law, “[a] person is subject to criminal prosecution and punishment in [Ohio] if . . . [t]he person commits an offense under the laws of this state, any element of which takes place in this state.” Ohio Rev. Code § 2901.11(A). In fact, one could potentially be prosecuted in an Ohio court for a violation of an Ohio law even if the person was not physically located in the state of Ohio when that crime was committed. See, e.g., Ohio Rev. Code § 2901.11(A)(3)-(7).
Look at Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.21, which makes it a crime for a person to fail to support that person’s child. Consider the fairness of the following scenario: A and B are a couple who live in Florida. While living in Florida, A and B have a child, C. Unfortunately, after C is born, A and B terminate their relationship and A is ordered by the state of Florida to pay child support to B for C. B and C then move to Ohio. While B and C reside in Ohio, A fails to pay child support and is then charged with a crime under Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.21.
In this scenario, does Ohio have jurisdiction to charge and convict A for a criminal violation of Ohio law? Should Ohio have jurisdiction to hear a criminal case against A for failure to pay child support?
Before answering these questions in the graded Discussion for this topic, consider the following cases:
- State v. Coley, 1st Dist. Hamilton No. C-040031, 2004-Ohio-5498
- State v. Vanderpoll, 9th Dist. Summit No. 22803, 2006-Ohio-52
- In a discussion post, answer the following questions:
- Under the law, does Ohio have jurisdiction to charge and convict A for a criminal violation of Ohio law? Explain your answer using the statute and case law provided.
- Is it fair to charge A in Ohio and make A defend a criminal action there despite not being physically present in Ohio at the time of the alleged crime?
- Why might someone disagree with your opinion regarding the fairness of charging A in Ohio?