Should Dax have been allowed to reject treatment for his burns (i.e. die via passive euthanasia)? Why?
- If yes, at what point should he have been allowed to make this decision? Immediately after his accident? Once his condition was more stable? Some other time? Why?
- If no, why should the doctor’s duty of beneficence outweigh Dax’s autonomy? Why?
Why? What STRONG reasons can you give to support that? (Look to the moral theories or that week’s readings for some support.)
What is a potential weakness to your view OR What is a potential objection to your view? (You do not need to respond to the objection but you can, if you want!)
